Introduction (Background)
The constitutional development of Nepal has not come a long way.
Earlier, during the reign of Gopal and Mahispal dynasty, no legal history is
found. During the Kirat Period, Mundhum and Dus Limbuwan ko Thiti were the
prime sources of law to govern the society. The Lichchhavi legal system was
based upon Hindu Dhramasastras and Smrities. After the arrival of Malla
dynasty, the era of written law started in Nepal when Jaysthiti Malla first
made Manav NyayaShastra.
During, the constitutional development of Nepal, the government of Nepal Act 2004 B.S is the first and historical document of Nepal which was declared by the Shree III Padma Shamsher JBR. The Padma Shamsher JBR himself was the inciter or promoter of this constitution. It was followed by the Interim Government Act 2007 after the introduction of democracy. Within a short period of hardly six decades, six different constitutions have been announced so far in Nepal. Those constitutions were not fully democratic. Those constitutions failed because they were not formulated according to the democratic participation and wishes of people. Some of them were formulated merely as the means for the rulers to satisfy their ambitious hunger for power. After the popular movement of 2062/63, Nepal started making a truly democratic constitution through an elected constituent assembly that could ensure widest possible public participation.
The following paragraphs briefly describe those constitutions of
Nepal:
Nepal Government Act 2004 BS, the first constitution of the land
consisted of 6 parts, 68 articles, and 1 schedule. It made provisions for
fundamental rights and duties, the council of ministers, courtiers' assembly,
the bicameral parliament, public service commission’s etc. It was supposed to
be promulgated on 1st Baishakh, 2005. But Prime Minister Padma
Shamsher could not enforce the constitution because of undue pressure from
resistant Ranas like Babar Shumsher and Mohan Shumsher. So, it just remained a
constitution without implementation.
Nepal Interim Government Act 2007 BS
Promulgated on 17th Chaitra 2007 BS after the
overthrow of the Rana autocracy, Nepal Interim Government Act 2007 BS was
divided into 7 parts, 73 articles, and 3 schedules. It made provisions for
directive principles and policies of the government, council, election
commission, financial procedure, etc. This interim constitution remained active
for unexpectedly a longer time as late as until 2015 BS.
The Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 2015 BS
As a more democratic constitution, the Constitution of the
Kingdom of Nepal 2015 BS made a provision for the adult franchise, bicameral
parliament, auditor general, constitutional monarchy, king's emergency power,
supreme court, an independent judiciary, election commission etc. It consisted
of 10 parts, 77 articles, and 3 schedules. This democratic constitution was
promulgated on 1st Falgun 2015 BS but was soon suspended almost
fully on 1stPoush 2017 by power seeking King Mahendra.
The Constitution of Nepal 2019 BS
As the fourth constitution of Nepal, the constitution of Nepal
2019 BS gave constitutional recognition to the party-less Panchayat system put
into practice by King Mahendra in 2017 BS. It was divided into 20 parts, 97
articles, and 2 schedules. It provided for people's fundamental rights, adult
franchise, the council of ministers, national panchayat, supreme court, etc.
Promulgated on 1stPoush 2019 BS, this constitution was amended in
2023 BS, 2032 BS, and 2037 BS and was finally abandoned by the popular movement
in 2046 BS that restored the multi-party system in the country.
The Constitution of Kingdom of Nepal 2047 BS
Promulgated by King Birendra on 23 Kartik 2047 BS after the
success of the Popular Movement I, the constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal
2047 BS was divided into 23 parts, 133 articles, and 3 schedules. It was noted
for its provisions for more fundamental rights, sovereignty inherent in people,
constitutional monarchy, multiparty democracy, adult franchise, independent
judicature, the rule of law, etc. However, some of its articles gave way to the
king's efforts for taking more executive movement II in 2063 BS.
The Interim Constitution of Nepal 2063 BS
The Interim Constitution of Nepal 2063 BS was promulgated on 1st Magh
2063 BS in the name of the people by legislative parliament. Divided into 25
parts, 167 articles, and 4 schedules, this constitution established Nepal as a
secular and republican state whose state power is inherent in the people. The
constitution provided for the unicameral legislature parliament, election to
the Constituent Assembly, recognition of Human Rights Commission as a
constitutional organ, originally the appointment of the Commander-in-Chief by
the Prime Minister and so on. It underwent eleven different amendments before
its fifth anniversary.
Constitution of Nepal - 2072 BS
The Constitution of Nepal 2072 BS was promulgated by President
Ram Baran Yadav unveiled on behalf of Speaker Subash Chandra Nembang on 3rd
Ashwin 2072 BS. It is divided into 35 parts, 308 articles, and 9 schedules. It
is the seventh constitution of Nepal. It was amended on 9th Magh 2072 B.S.
The following are the
major characteristics of the constitution:
- Secularism
- Federal model with seven provinces
- Democratic Republican State
- Independent and fair judiciary
- Executive rights on Council of Ministers
- President as a ceremonial head of the state
- Full press freedom
- Citizenship by descent to a child of a Nepali father or
mother
- Sovereignty of people
Timeline of Constitutional Development in
Nepal
Period
|
Phases
|
Constitutional Development
|
1768 – 1854
|
Pre-Constitutional Period
|
1768: State of Nepal formed.
1854: Proclamation of Muluki Ain (Law of the
Land), the first codification of traditional laws in common practice
commissioned by Rana, Jung Bahadur.
|
1947- 1959
|
Three Early Constitutions
|
1.Nepal Government Act 2004 BS (1948)
2. Nepal Interim Government Act 2007 BS (1951)
3. The Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal
2015 BS (1959)
|
1960- 1989
|
Return to Autocracy I
|
1960 King Mahendra dismisses Prime Minister
Koirala government, enacts emergency rule and suspends the 1959 constitution.
The Constitution of Nepal 2019 BS (1962)
1980: National Referendum (May) held on the
question of return to multi-party democracy or continuing the Panchayat
system with reforms.
The
allegedly rigged referendum result favor reform in Panchayat system with a small
majority –55% against the 45% support registered for multi-party system.
|
1990- 2001
|
Second Democratic Experience
|
1990: People’s Movement for the restoration
of multi-party democracy (April). King Birendra bows to popular pressure
after 55 days of protests nationwide,
The Constitution of Kingdom of Nepal 2047 BS
(1990)
1996: Communist Party of Nepal – Maoist
submits 40 points demand to the government with ultimatum to launch war if
the demands not met.
People’s war launched by CPN – Maoist
(February)
|
2002- 2006
|
Return to Autocracy II
|
2002: King dissolves Parliament on the
advice of Prime Minister Deuba (May). Date for new election set for November.
King removes Prime Minister Deuba from
office and proclaims assumption of executive power.
2005: King removes Deuba from office second
time in less than two years (February). Proclaims himself as the chief
executive and head of the council of ministers.
|
2007-2015
|
Return to democracy
|
Interim Constitution of Nepal 2007
(ICON-2007) promulgated by the House of Representative.
Maoists join the interim government under
ICON-2007 (April)
Eight Party meeting fixes new date for
holding election of CA by third week ofNovember, 2007 (May)
Constitution of Nepal - 2072 BS
|
Problems identification
The
constitution of Nepal has practiced almost failure of six constitution in six
times. Unlike the previous constitutions, the new Constitution recognizes the ethnic
diversity of the country. The constitutional development towards changes in
society from different aspects like cultural aspect, religious aspect, rights
of minority, women, indigenous people, can be seen in some level. Minority people
struggle for an identity, and demand that the identity be publicly acknowledged.
Nepal appears to have accommodated ethnicity
in the legal structure of the Country while retaining national identity with a
federal system of government. There is a need for additional measures both
legal and political, to address the problem of disadvantaged ethnic groups in
heterogeneous societies like Nepal.
The
Present constitution is more democratic than any other constitution which was
made from the constitution assembly where more than ninety percent were in favor
while promulgation of constitution. However, some big leaders like Dr. Baburam
Bhattarai was skeptical in its legitimacy and ownership. Also, major madhesi
political parties have always tried to raise the question of madhesis
legitimacy.
The
Constitution Day in Nepal will always remain to be The Black Day for
Madhesis until the meaningful amendment of the constitution addresses their
dissatisfaction. Unless the constitution is amended, its legitimacy will always
be questioned. The Madhes will have ownership over this constitution only after
it is amended to meet their aspirations. Then only, it will be observed the Constitution
Day. The ownership of the constitution is always challenging part in the
history of constitutional development of Nepal.
Analysis of Issues
The
constitutional development of Nepal has ended monarchy to Republican country,
Hindu-Kingdom to Secularism and Unitary government system to Federal Government
system. The new federal system of government is to address the social diversity
and identity of the country. Nepal have move forward in inclusive democracy and
provided 31 fundamental rights guaranteed in the constitution. However, the law-making
procedure has not completed in the present time. The implementation of law after its procurement should be done
quickly as possible within the time frame provided in constitution. The
implementation of the constitution is the challenging part for the government
and to raise the ownership of constitution of unsatisfied groups as well either
through the amendment of constitution if necessary.
Nepal
is also a secular country in the world. The constitution of Nepal declares
secular but the practice existed in societies is a Hindu-dominance by a state
level. Cow slaughtering is against law in Nepal existed only in the Nepalese
societies in the world. This current issue is the most debatable in Nepal where
the slaughtering of cow is illegal under two grounds, first cow is the holy
animal in Hindu religion and they worship as a mother, however in reality it is
found many Hindu religion follower do not believe in making animal as a mother.
Second, it is the national animal of Nepal. Under, this many countries like
France, Australia do not impose any restriction under it. For e.g., cock is the
national animal of France but chicken is popular there. Hence, state should not
do interference and regulation in food like beef which cannot be regulated. Beef
is popular in many parts of the countries in the world. Further, slaughtering
of cow is the culture of certain communities’ group and tradition like Kirati
in “Sakhewa”, Tamang, Sherpa, Rai, Limbu community group. So, it will not be
wrong to call as cultural religious hegemony still prevails of Hindu at some
level from the Hindu kingdom to Secularism country.
Conclusions
Ninety-four years after the promulgation of Muluki
Ain, Nepal had its first constitution. With the rise of democracy, the need for
constitution further garnished. Within six decades, six different constitutions
have been announced so far in Nepal. Those constitutions were not fully
democratic. Those constitutions failed because they were not formulated
according to the democratic participation and wishes of people. Some of them
were formulated merely as the means for the rulers to satisfy their ambitious
hunger for power.
Nepal is a federal democratic republic country. The
present constitution of Nepal leaves an unsatisfied madhesi people behind
during the drafting procedure of constitution. Nepal has moved a forward at
present context and successfully conducted a three- tier election. However, the
government should pay attention to all the unsatisfied groups and their demands
and must try to Build ownership of constitution in a democratic way.
Comments
Post a Comment